http://www.gamersnexus.net/hwrev ... s-benchmarks/page-4

This first chart shows two things, primarily: We’re looking at CPU junction temperature in blue and averaged core frequency in red during a Prime workload. Ideally, the red line is perfectly flat when under heavy load, indicating a more stable core clock. The blue line should never exceed 75C, as that is AMD’s maximum junction temperature for the 1800X – or TjMax. We were able to trip a thermal shutdown by intentionally heating the CPU beyond 75C, validating that TjMax is in fact around 75C (+/-2C reading in AI Suite). Note that although the junction sensor is perfectly precise, it is not necessarily perfectly accurate – nor is software’s ability to interpret the sensor data. There may be latencies in some software solutions, and other differences in sensor accuracy could mean that you see temperature reports exceeding 75C; that does not mean Tjunction is actually >75C in reality, it just means that the sensor thinks that’s the case. Depending on what type of sensor is used, there are often accuracy ranges of 1-2.2C. Precision remains unimpacted by this. Using software which does not make adjustments to the raw junction output by the CPU means, like in the case of early AIDA64 revisions during this testing, that you may see temperatures ~20-30C below what reliable tools report.

We did our best with a combination of AI Suite and HW Monitor. Ryzen Master was not made available to media until we were on planes for an event. Prior to our finalized test run, we mounted thermocouples to the IHS to get an understanding of external case temperature, then compared that to a few other DUTs to build a knowledgebase of the temperature logging behavior on Ryzen. This was plotted versus various software solutions. We then removed those thermocouples and began temperature testing with our chosen two.

Gauging thermal performance on AMD isn’t exactly easy, and the diode reporting has some inconsistencies at times that manifest in the form of massive reported temperature drops.
直接用温度传感器测完之后发现华硕的ai suite数据更接近实际温度。

满屏英文很难阅读……最后的结论，不是华硕主板的人如何破？

这传感器放哪里可是个玄学

我家以前的巴顿3000+，老是自动过热重启，后来网上搜了下，把cpu插槽附近的一个热电偶掰弯一点就没事了

outel现在读的温度好像不是主板测的是cpu内部的传感器？

半导体器件，结温跟外面第一圈热沉的温度差老远了

引用:

原帖由 阿卡 于 2017-3-16 13:41 发表
满屏英文很难阅读……最后的结论，不是华硕主板的人如何破？

温度探头插cpu散热片里咯

最重要的是要明确，这不是amd的锅

aida64里cpu两个温度，差了20度

引用:

原帖由 ylgtx 于 2017-3-16 15:47 发表
aida64里cpu两个温度，差了20度

锐龙 AMD Ryzen处理器的主要温度传感器tCTL在Ryzen 7 1800X与Ryzen 7 1700X上设置了+20℃的偏移，这样做的目的是为了确保所有Ryzen处理器都有一致的风扇策略。

Ryzen 7 1700处理器的温度是正确的，另外两个带X的要减去20℃

也就是说你们现在看到Ryzen 7 1800X/1700X处理器的温度偏高是个假象，实际温度需要在官方超频软件里的显示的值减去20℃，AMD相信温度检测软件很快就会更新修正这个偏移，正确的报告实时温度。

这个思路太奇葩