塑料味+1

SGS2的屏幕就适合显示卡通味重的东西，特别鲜明醒目

http://www.phonearena.com/news/S ... ina-Display_id18088

In the end, here's our summary: what we like more on the iPhone 4's IPS-LCD screen is its incredibly high resolution, natural-looking colors, as well as great outdoor and wide-angle visibility, with the latter being on par with Super AMOLED Plus. The Galaxy S II's Super AMOLED Plus however leaves its mark when it comes to awesome contrasts (these are contrasts, which are near complete awesomeness, by the way), as well as greatly-saturated colors, which can make even the most boring of images stand out.

其实很早前就有结论了。

关键问题是，绝大部分用户绝大部分时间看手机，是在看软件，看网页，看游戏，看视频，看照片的实际很少。

看软件，看游戏，AMOLED是完胜的。

看网页，看视频，AMOLED和IPS各有胜负。

看照片，AMOLED完败。

引用:

原帖由 shacg 于 2011-9-22 15:27 发表



光一个可视角度，9100的这块amoled就完败了，还完胜。。。233

我看久这块屏幕之后再抬头看真实环境，会有极度不适感，一是觉得周围色彩太惨淡了，这不用说，因为屏幕太浓郁，其次是眼睛白平衡不准，因为这块 ...

手机屏幕的可视角度干嘛要好？

Super AMOLED Plus vs Super AMOLED vs Retina DisplayPosted: 13 Apr 2011, 07:03, by Daniel P.
Categories: Samsung, Apple, Articles, Android
Bookmark
Share this page:Discuss41Tweet

Updated with additional pictures and info

We quickly put the preview unit of the Samsung Galaxy S II that's making the rounds in the office next to last year's best screen technologies - the Super AMOLED display on the Samsung Galaxy S, and the IPS-LCD Retina Display on the iPhone 4.

For pitting three of the most advanced screen technologies on existing smartphones, we used the studio setup you can see here, with diffused lighting on both sides with the same color temperature as daylight, for reference purposes, and then turned the light off for shots in complete darkness. For the camera white balance adjustment, we used three matte patches on cardboard: 90% white, 18% grey, and 1% black (velvet).

The two sources have the same color temperature as daylight

The contrast on the Super AMOLED screens is higher, but the iPhone 4's IPS-LCD is brighter, as you can see in the shots below, which comes in handy in broad daylight. Samsung has tried to compensate with a low-reflectance coating, but the results don't seem to be good enough.

Left to right - Samsung Galaxy S, Samsung Galaxy S II, Apple iPhone 4

Text on Sammy's newest flagship appears crisper now, than on the display of the Galaxy S, due to the fact that Samsung's Super AMOLED Plus technology uses a normal RGB matrix for the pixel arrangement, not the PenTile one on the first generation, which utilized less subpixels, thus altering the perceived resolution.

Both matrix arrangements, however, can't beat the Retina Display resolution.

Left to right - Samsung Galaxy S, Samsung Galaxy S II, Apple iPhone 4

There is this bluish hue that overcasts the AMOLED displays, and Super AMOLED Plus ones for that matter. Conversely, the IPS-LCD as found on the iPhone 4 manages to present us with somewhat more natural colors, although not as saturated and popping-out.

In the end, here's our summary: what we like more on the iPhone 4's IPS-LCD screen is its incredibly high resolution, natural-looking colors, as well as great outdoor and wide-angle visibility, with the latter being on par with Super AMOLED Plus. The Galaxy S II's Super AMOLED Plus however leaves its mark when it comes to awesome contrasts (these are contrasts, which are near complete awesomeness, by the way), as well as greatly-saturated colors, which can make even the most boring of images stand out.

Left to right - Samsung Galaxy S, Samsung Galaxy S II, Apple iPhone 4

况且U2410也只是LCD显示器

引用:

原帖由 shacg 于 2011-9-22 16:29 发表



这个问题我回答不能.........IDC最高

另外SAP的可视角度也不差，不是极端角度的话完全没问题。

问题是你拿个色域还不如AMOLED的U2410做基准……

类似一个色弱的给人家测颜色辨识度……

手机屏幕即使能，是否需要准确表达颜色呢？

实际上大家都夸SONY的电视色彩效果好，不过SONY的电视颜色准吗？

再跑个题，监听音箱声音准，一般人喜欢那么准，那么无音染的声音？

随便玩哪个游戏，难道不是SAP屏幕的效果更好？

引用:

原帖由 jun4rui 于 2011-9-22 17:00 发表


有句刚句，俺仔细看了楼主贴的老外评测，为啥老外测试的可视角度，IP4这么差？和楼主结论完全相反？

老外评测是明亮环境，楼主是在黑不溜的地方拍的。

高亮环境是LCD杀手

说实话，我手上的国行SGS2，侧面170度看也没有明显偏色