禁止为所欲为就专利被侵害提出诉讼

先抄一段同样来自Reuters的报道：
https://www.reuters.com/article/ ... rizon-idUSKCN1TF1BK

Large companies like Verizon will try to identify patents they might be violating, said Gaston Kroub, a patent lawyer in New York. But that can be a challenge because so many patents are granted every year, Kroub said.

“Sophisticated companies like Verizon understand that they could be approached by licensors of any stripe at any time,” Kroub said. The philosophy of wireless carriers and smartphone companies, Kroub said, can be “let’s deal with these claims as they arrive, because we don’t know who will knock on our door next.”

Tom Cotter, a professor of patent law at the University of Minnesota, said it was possible Huawei executives believe Verizon has been infringing their U.S. patents for some time but for business reasons waited until now to seek compensation.

Patent owners “may not enforce their patents for a period of time, but they can choose do to so whenever they want to,” Cotter said. “It happens all the time.”

接下来是我的个人观点：
1，Rubio的态度和做法代表了现在的最强硬派，会给美国带来很多外国的批评。但美国对外政策一向简单粗暴，他们就不在乎外界批评。。。
2，我不觉得Verzion的“侵犯”专利和华为的“盗窃”专利是一个层面的事情。打个不恰当的比方，好比孩子偷家里钱被打屁股和一个人在路上用棒球棒攻击另外一个人，都是打人，但程度和目的不同。华为今年被FBI搜查因为下面这事，我觉得这不像Verizon那种“专利太多，我也避不开，等着对方上门要钱”。“let’s deal with these claims as they arrive, because we don’t know who will knock on our door next”。华为这是有意明抢：“Sample was returned from Huawei, in pieces. “It came back inside the box, you could hear glass breaking against it,” Khan said. “We open it back up and then putting the pieces together, you could see there was large portions of the glass missing.”
“Huawei had blasted the Glass Sample with a 100-kilowatt laser, powerful enough to be used as a weapon.”

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/f ... eting-chinese-giant
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/h ... ctor-202413843.html
3，我从第一天开始学习路由交换，就知道有个公司叫华为，抄袭Cisco起家。后面听到有关他们不正当竞争消息越来越多，但公司越做越大。干掉华为 v.s. 美国被人批评，两害相较取其轻，我选干掉华为