posted by wap, platform: iPhone

引用:

原帖由 @monkeyxu  于 2017-4-24 08:06 发表
有个前提
房东和老板之前是有IAP协议约定的。

问题是目前看来没有

posted by wap, platform: iPhone

引用:

原帖由 @elia  于 2017-4-24 11:09 发表
没签协议怎么上架

争议来源就是协议文本对于打赏行为是不是属于内购还是模糊不清，苹果最合适的办法自然是修改协议，更明确的定义强制iap的场景。

3.1.1 In-App Purchase:
If you want to unlock features or functionality within your app, (by way of example: subscriptions, in-game currencies, game levels, access to premium content, or unlocking a full version), you must use in-app purchase. Apps may not include buttons, external links, or other calls to action that direct customers to purchasing mechanisms other than IAP.
Any credits or in-game currencies purchased via IAP must be consumed within the app and may not expire, and you should make sure you have a restore mechanism for any restorable in-app purchases.
Remember to assign the correct purchasability type or your app will be rejected.
Apps should not directly or indirectly enable gifting of IAP content, features, or consumable items to others.
Apps distributed via the Mac App Store may host plug-ins or extensions that are enabled with mechanisms other than the App Store.

本帖最后由 DarthVadar 于 2017-4-24 11:51 通过手机版编辑

posted by wap, platform: iPhone

引用:

原帖由 @cf3b5  于 2017-4-24 12:02 发表
其实也就是有些人想不清楚才觉得模糊不清而已，对于苹果来说应该还是清楚的！
接受打赏的公众号本身就是商家或者自媒体，这些人开公众号的目的就是为了获取利益，接受的打赏就是属于这些人的收益，因此要求走IAP也合理……

苹果在商言商，认为腾讯通过打赏打擦边球那么就细化规则，然后一视同仁，坐地收钱，没有任何问题。
规则定义不明确，自然就有争议。其他任何的诸如腾讯通过公众号积累流量从而盈利或者打赏是一种基于内容的盈利模式等等都不构成苹果直接强制打赏走iap的理据。
反过来说，如果微信打赏最初就违反了iap协议，那么苹果完全有权利直接将微信下架app store。

本帖最后由 DarthVadar 于 2017-4-24 12:19 通过手机版编辑