一般来说
买了有ESP的车会认为必要性高
买了没ESP的车会认为必要性不高

引用:

原帖由 cecily家的胖子 于 2013-11-10 09:51 发表
肯定有用，TC应该i像美国一样立法强制安装。
不过话又说回来，救车靠技术，ESP提高不了极限，赛道上的车没一个会开ESP。。。

要看车的
有些尾部太活跃的后驱车做绕桩就算是专业车手关了ESP也没开ESP快，至于赛道上不开ESP因为快是一方面FUN又是另一方面

引用:

原帖由 chenpeinin 于 2013-11-10 10:05 发表
开到现在，一共3辆车了，ABS只启动过一次，在桥上，下雪结冰打滑，只有现在的车有ESP，但是从来没启动过，我个人认为，有更好，没有也可，不会刻意去追求这个东西，因为开车的理念是永远不让这个东西启动，不要追求万 ...

那讨论汽车安全性也没意义了，最好是不撞呗

引用:

原帖由 hudihutian 于 2013-11-11 16:49 发表
传感器电路板ABS泵，哪个是物料成本占大头的东西，哪像轮胎，那可是要东南亚猴子一棵树一棵树去割胶的，成本根本降不下来

有ESP的车就没轮胎了？

引用:

原帖由 hudihutian 于 2013-11-11 19:20 发表
posted by wap, platform: Galaxy S II

这是你说的，我的意思是esp成本不高，还不如高级轮胎成本高

引用:

ESC这种电控设备，成本才多少，我要是车厂我也愿意用这个，轮胎多贵啊

我还想问一下，丰田没ESC的车用了什么高级轮胎？

引用:

原帖由 鬼舞者4 于 2013-11-11 19:44 发表
高六有ESP，所以用了锦湖轮胎，是不是这个道理？:D

卡罗拉没ESP所以用了DUNLOP SP01轮胎，4个同尺寸的SP01比4个锦湖贵出的钱买ESP还有找，不是丰田不肯装ESP是让消费者利益最大化，是不是这个道理？

引用:

原帖由 hudihutian 于 2013-11-11 20:57 发表
posted by wap, platform: Galaxy S II

所有的主机厂都能省就省。。。。

esc当然有用，只不过从提升行车安全的角度看，如果说重要性，这esc不知道要排哪位去了

无非是新型电子设备，配置表上好看，夺人眼球才 ...

IIHS News | October 28, 2004


Electronic stability control found effective; main effect is to reduce single-vehicle crash risk, including the risk of fatal single-vehicle crashes

About half of the 28,000 fatal passenger vehicle crashes that occur each year involve a single vehicle. Equipping cars and SUVs with electronic stability control (ESC) can reduce the risk of involvement in these crashes by more than 50 percent. The effect on all single-vehicle crashes (fatal and nonfatal) is somewhat less (about 40 percent), and the effect on multiple-vehicle crashes is much less. These are the main findings of a new Insurance Institute for Highway Safety study comparing crash rates for cars and SUVs with and without ESC.
Together these studies, including the Institute's new one, indicate that widespread application of ESC in the vehicle fleet can be expected to afford a significant safety benefit. If all vehicles on U.S. roads had ESC, we might avoid as many as 800,000 of the 2 million or so single-vehicle crashes that occur each year. About 14,000 fatal single-vehicle crashes occurred in 2003, which means there's a potential to save more than 7,000 lives each year
http://www.iihs.org/iihs/news/de ... gle-vehicle-crashes

IIHS News | June 13, 2006

Electronic stability control could prevent nearly one-third of all fatal crashes and reduce rollover risk by as much as 80%; effect is found on single- and multiple-vehicle crashes

Previous research found significant effects of ESC in reducing the risk of fatal single-vehicle crashes. Using data from an additional year of crashes and a larger set of vehicle models, researchers at the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety have updated the 2004 results and found that ESC reduces the risk of fatal multiple-vehicle crashes by 32 percent.

The new research confirms that ESC reduces the risk of all single-vehicle crashes by more than 40 percent — fatal ones by 56 percent. The researchers estimate that if all vehicles were equipped with ESC, as many as 10,000 fatal crashes could be avoided each year.
http://www.iihs.org/iihs/news/de ... ple-vehicle-crashes



[ 本帖最后由 toshiya115 于 2013-11-11 21:41 编辑 ]