» 您尚未登录:请 登录 | 注册 | 标签 | 帮助 | 小黑屋 |


 21 12
发新话题
打印

[业评] 无聊中, 相对科学客观的对比下NS与PS4的CPU性能.

posted by wap, platform: iPhone
cpu差一半 那gpu差多少啊


TOP

平板大战上网本。。



TOP

posted by wap, platform: Meizu M9
引用:
原帖由 @sakat  于 2017-9-3 07:45 发表
cpu差一半 那gpu差多少啊
功耗差多少?


TOP

posted by wap, platform: Chrome
GPU性能至少差3倍。
PS4 的7850-7870之间,X分可以到2300.
NS显卡性能只有GT750的一半,频率还低很多。GT750的X分是1600,NS只有800左右.

TOP

看标题就知道是Geekbench
引用:
Wilco, geekbench has apparently replaced dhrystone as your favourite useless benchmark.

Geekbench is SH*T.

It actually seems to have gotten worse with version 3, which you should be aware of. On ARM64, that SHA1 performance is hardware-assisted. I don't know if SHA2 is too, but Aarch64 does apparently do SHA256 in the crypto unit, so it might be fully or partially so.

And on both ARM and x86, the AES numbers are similarly just about the crypto unit.

So basically a quarter to a third of the "integer" workloads are just utter BS. They are not comparable across architectures due to the crypto units, and even within one architecture the numbers just don't mean much of anything.

And quite frankly, it's not even just the crypto ones. Looking at the other GB3 "benchmarks", they are mainly small kernels: not really much different from dhrystone. I suspect most of them have a code footprint that basically fits in a L1I cache.

Linus

TOP

不懂,凑热闹
多核性能差距在50% 是不是可以理解成switch的机能是PS4的一半?
switch=PS4÷2=PS2?

TOP

 21 12
发新话题
     
官方公众号及微博